-
Home Site Map Contact
FREE newsletter:
Search LDW®:  
 
 
 
ldyellowpages.org Find Your Country University Access LDCJ Login  Member Login
About Us  Ways to Support LDW®  JoinLDW® LD Job Search  Conferences LDW® Store
 
About Us
   Welcome
   LDW® Board 
   Professional Advisory Board
   International Advisory Board
    LDW® Brochure
    Our Sponsors
 
In Our Store

Contemporary Approaches to the Assessment of Children with Learning Disabilities

 LDW® Store Buy Now 
 
ldyellowpages.org
   Find Professionals      
   Find Products
   Find Schools
   Find Professional Resources
 
 

 

   
About LDCJ
See sample articles:

You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view articles.
Editorial Board
Editorial Policy and Submission Guidelines
Benefits of Being Published in LDCJ:
  • Your article would be seen by over 24,000 subscribers
  • LDCJ is carried by EBSCO
  • LDCJ is a peer-reviewed journal
  • A PDF version of your article would automatically be emailed to you upon publication
  • Your article would be listed in a bibliography on our website
  • Your article could be chosen for inclusion in the University Access section of our website
  • Past Issues
    View the content pages from past issues of LDCJ
    If you want to receive the content pages for the next issue please provide us with your email:


       
    Home : Publications : Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal
    Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal

    Table of Contents
    Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal
    March 2007 Volume 5, No. 1

    Self-Regulated Strategy Development: A Validated Model to Support Students Who Struggle with Writing
    Tanya Santangelo, Karen R.Harris and Steve Graham
    Many students find writing extremely difficult and frustrating because they are not able to learn and apply the strategies used by skilled writers. Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) is a comprehensive, flexible model that explicitly helps students learn to manage the writing process. An extensive body of research has documented that SRSD consistently increases content knowledge, writing quality, strategic behavior, self-regulation skills, self-efficacy, and motivation among students of varying ages and ability levels, but especially those with learning disabilities. Further, these improvements are maintained over time and generalized across settings, genres, people, and media. In this article, common challenges with writing are reviewed, the SRSD model is presented, and an illustration of how a persuasive writing strategy was taught to a small group of fifth- and sixth-grade students is offered.

    Place Value and Mathematics for Students with Mild Disabilities: Data and Suggested Practices
    John F. Cawley, Rene S. Parmar, Lynn M. Lucas-Fusco, Joy D. Kilian, and Teresa E. Foley
    Place value is a phenomenon that has ominous implications for developing number sense and meaning and for using alternative algorithms and alternative representations within whole number arithmetic. For the most part, school programs examine place value at a surface level, with a primary focus on having the student identify or state a number value according to its positional setting. For example, in 146 the student is asked to state the value of the "4" as 40 or as four 10's. Seldom is place value examined for its deep structure potential by incorporating, for example, expanded notation to complete an item. Our interest is in the deep structure view of place value models (e.g., Ross, 1986, 1989, 1990), which delved more deeply into selected meanings of place value and their implications. In modeling the work of Ross with a sample of students with mild disabilities, the tasks were constructed from her model and the data are presented following her procedure. This paper presents data from a developmental inquiry of the place value performance of 126 students with mild disabilities on six place value tasks. A discussion of the multiplicity of meanings and activities related to knowing and doing arithmetic with an emphasis on place value is presented.

    Strategy Instruction in Reading Comprehension: An Intervention Study for Students with Learning Disabilities
    Faye Antoniou and Elmar Souvignier
    Teaching reading strategies and guiding students towards self-regulated reading routines are promising approaches to fostering reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate in a sample of 73 fifth to eighth graders with learning disabilities (IQ higher than 85 and reading skills below expectation) a reading-strategy program containing reading and self-regulation strategies. The program was taught to the experimental group by their general or special education teachers, whereas the control group received traditional reading instruction. A pre-, post- and followup design was used during an entire academic year assessing reading-strategy knowledge, reading comprehension, and reading self-efficacy. Immediately after completion of the program only effects on reading strategy knowledge were significant; however, followup measures yielded meaningful gains in the experimental group for reading comprehension (d = .80), reading-strategy knowledge (d = .62), and reading self-efficacy (d = .78).

    The Effect of Asymmetry on the 2x2 Kappa Coefficient: Application to the Study of Learning Disabilities
    Teresa Rivas-Moya and María-José González-Valenzuela
    In educational practice, for the evaluation and diagnosis of learning disabilities (LD), it is advisable to use standardized tests together with observation questionnaires. When observation questionnaires are used in the study of LD, Cohen’s (1960) kappa coefficient (k) is frequently applied as a measure of agreement between two raters when they independently classify a sample of subjects in several categories. In practice, a good interpretation cannot be made if the conditions surrounding the calculation are not taken into consideration. This investigation presents a study of asymmetry and its effect on the kinterpretation. In Study 1, the importance of symmetry is highlighted by means of several examples that show agreement between two raters when classifying 60 subjects in one of two categories. From these examples the interpretation of k is complemented with the information given by (a) asymmetry analyzed by descriptive and graphical methods and hypothesis tests; and (b) other values, such as maximum observed agreement, maximum reachable agreement, and maximum unreachable agreement. In Study 2, the concepts of Study 1 are applied to examples of LD.

    Story Mapping and Its Effects on the Writing Fluency and Word Diversity of Students with Learning Disabilities
    Daqi Li
    Students with learning disabilities (LD) often experience difficulties in writing fluently and using a diversity of words. To help these students, specific and effective writing strategies must be incorporated into instruction and demonstrated to them through modeling. This study examined the effectiveness of using a story map and story map questions to improve the story writing fluency and word usage diversity of four students with LD using a multiple-probe design. Results showed that three of the four students improved their writing fluency. Regarding the diversity of word usage, no considerable changes were found in the students’ writing performance. This finding supports the use of the story mapping strategy by teachers who are looking for ways to improve the writing fluency of students with LD. For students who struggle with the diversity of word usage in story writing, it is suggested this strategy be used in combination with other strategies that focus on improving word usage.

     
     
    Print This Page           Email This Page          Link to Us

    Top | Home | Contact Us | Join LDW® | Site Policies | Privacy Policy | Site Map

    © 2006 Learning Disabilities Worldwide, Inc.

    P.O. Box 142, Weston, MA 02493   Phone: (781) 890-5399   Fax: (781) 890-0555
     
    LDW® is a registered trademark of Learning Disabilities Worldwide, Inc.